Marc Randazza drew Stephanie DeYoung into his battle with Blogger Crystal Cox and with no regard for her rights, her family, or her quality of life.

Marc Randazza posted something on his blog that was retracted on the Internet Long ago. What good is retraction laws, and the ability to "Edit", if attorneys like Marc Randazza take retracted information and make it live.

This retracted statement was sent to Marc Randazza by David Aman, the Plaintiff's Attorney, it is assumed. This post was labeled as directly the words of Summit Bankruptcy Insider Stephanie DeYoung, yet when Stephanie DeYoung committed on Marc Randazza's blog, he, being a Free Speech Advocate, would not allow her comment to be posted.

Then Marc Randazza, in his mission to discredit Blogger Crystal Cox, he, posted a commented on that very post that said it was Blogger Crystal Cox, herself, who made the comment, so he refused to let the comment through. Marc Randazza Stated this April 6th 2012, and it is shown in the video "Crazy Blogger Crystal Cox" which is full of partial quotes, false light and flat out lies about Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza did this, even though he knew full well that the comment on April 4th 2012 was from Stephanie, as he had emailed her right after she posted the second comment. Marc Randazza is protecting Big Media's foothold over the rights of Citizen Journalists, and Anti-Corruption Bloggers.

Marc Randazza is protecting big wigs in the Porn Industry and saying it is all in the name of free speech, yet Marc Randazza is suppressing Free Speech. David Carr of the New York Times and Kashmir Hill of AboveTheLaw.com and Forbes is helping Marc Randazza in creating this web of lies and deceit to silence, intimidate, and pressure Blogger Crystal Cox into NOT Appealing her case. And in making others believe that I am not a journalist because of my alleged "standards" in which is not true. "Standards" have nothing to do with whether I am a journalist legally or not and nothing to do with if that blog post was true or not.

Also keep in mind, I was not on trial for Extortion, nor has their even been a criminal complaint filed, as it is simply not true, in which I have proved. Yet the New York Times and Forbes cannot have bloggers thinking they are "Journalists" or Big Media will Tumble. I say boycott Big Media as they Tell Big Lies and are protected by laws that real news reporters such as bloggers are not protected by.

Marc Randazza was going to represent blogger Crystal Cox in an appeal that affects all bloggers and all citizens in their free speech rights (Obsidian V. Cox). Yet soon after Blogger Crystal Cox chose a different Lawyer, Marc Randazza launched a campaign of hate and lies to create an illusion, a distraction surrounding the alleged motives of Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza is acting as if he agrees that bloggers can be journalists, just not this one.

However, what has happened to me to keep bloggers down and not give bloggers the same rights as "journalists", also happened to Shellee Hale and allegedly 200 other bloggers. My case is simply the most buzz, because it had the biggest price tag in my judgement of $2.5 Million Dollars.

Marc Randazza has deliberately lied about Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, Over and Over. The motive is clearly to attempt to STOP my Appeal, to discredit me, to provide a smoke screen to the corruption I am exposing, of which also involves Lightsquared and iViewit. Both in which Marc Randazza's buddies, clients Liberty Media, Corbin Fisher and Others, will lose BILLIONS over.

Marc Randazza even went so far as lie to Stephanie Deyoung about Blogger Crystal Cox, in claiming she was changing the focus of the story from Kevin Padrick to herself, knowing full well that Blogger Crystal Cox constantly blogs on the Summit Bankruptcy. This was a lie to make people turn on this "One" Blogger, Crystal Cox, even though she is simply getting the corruption story found, it is not her story, nor did she make it up or knowingly post false information.

Marc Randazza has contacted others to get them to turn on me, and yet the Truth is still standing if anyone wants to actually look at the facts instead of simply joining the Marc Randazza Attack on Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza is part of suing 35,000 innocent people that Corbin Fisher, Liberty Media seem to have baited into downloading videos, and is now extorting these folks for what he is calling an "Amnesty Program". This is a video technology that is owned by the iViewit Technology Company, in which the inventors have not got a dime. And this amazing videos technology was invented over a decade ago, by the iViewit inventors. Corbin Fisher, Liberty Media seem to be "in" with MPEG LA in using the IViewit Technology with NO Legal Right to the Video Imaging Technology.

Marc Randazza is a powerful attorney in this "game", as his connections are pretty high in the Porn Industry, which seems to control many judges and attorneys. However, I have faith that the Truth will prevail. We cannot let the Marc Randazza Lie, stand as the Truth just because he has big connections and many blogger thugs to paint fluff about him, to hide the Truth.

Here is what Stephanie DeYoung, Bankruptcy Whistle Blower Posted on her Blog Today, regarding the Marc Randazza Battle against Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.

"It has come to my attention that Marc Randazza (http://randazza.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/new-york-times-chimes-in-on-the-crystal-cox-story/) has been obsessed with a blogger fight with Crystal Cox

Not sure how this works, but I thought when you delete a post it does go away. I am wondering if he is getting this information from Kevin Padrick or David Aman.

Anyway, I commented on his posts regarding these deleted posts, but he decided to not allow them to show up on his blog. So, I will put them here on my blog…


1. Stephanie DeYoung says:


Your comment is awaiting moderation.

April 4, 2012 at 8:06 am

Dear Author,

It is nice that you have used an old post of mine that I have removed. My post was in part true and in part emotionally based. You see, Crystal was fighting for me because my family had me hospitalized because I had a manic episode after fleeing for my life from Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance and David Aman of Tonkon Torp.

They had harassed me, bullied me, and took all my investments using tactics such as freezing bank accounts, filing court proceedings, making false accusations in the newspaper and in the court documents, making me do a deposition before any of the Summit 1031 Accommodators owners had to, making me do a 2004 documentation request, ignoring my rights in my ownership in various properties, etc.

While trying to fight for my rights, they played their attorney games with my attorney’s making my attorney bills huge. I finally ran out of money to fight for my rights, so they got my properties by me filing for bankruptcy so they couldn’t keep coming after me. They simply took my children’s investment illegally, but again I have no money now to fight it and even if I did, it wouldn’t be enough because Kevin Padrick has way more money and resources, that no justice could ever be found.

So Crystal attacked my family because they hospitalized me in a total inappropriate manner and I believe there was some other powers higher up that contributed to the way things went down.

Anyway, I removed the post you have here on this blog because after I was done being angry at everyone including Crystal, I realized it was emotionally charged and without merit.
I wish you would get the story straight on who the true predator is.

Sincerely,
Stephanie Studebaker-DeYoung"

Source of Post and Full Marc Randazza Article with all emails, Click Below

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?p=3441

Please Investigate the Summit Bankruptcy Story and Help Bring Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Judge Randall Dunn, Sussman Shank, Steven Hedberg Perkins Coie, Miller Nash, Dept. of Justice Pamela Griffith and Obsidian Finance Group to Justice. Find the Truth, dig into the story independent of Plaintiff and Defendant, Independent of ALL. Do not jump on the Marc Randazza band wagon. Knowledge is Power. Find the Facts for yourself.

Investigate the Summit Bankruptcy and Prove that Bloggers are Journalists.

Here are research links to More on the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy, Kevin Padrick, David, Aman, Tonkon Torp, Perkins Coie, Judge Randall Dunn, Steven Hedberg.

My Blog on Obsidian Finance Group
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/

Stephanie DeYoung Summit Bankruptcy Whistle Blower Blog, NOT Mine
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/

Documents I gave the courts to prove the source of the post
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/2011/12/in-obsidian-v-cox-i-provided.html

Here is Exhibit 520 that I gave Judge Marco Hernandez, Portland Oregon 

To Show the Source of the Post I was on Trial For. 

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/111075477/Exhibit-520-Statement-of-Source-of-Blog-Post

Obsidian V. Cox Trial Transcripts
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/117800653/Obsidian-V-Cox-Trial-Transcripts


Meeting Videos
http://www.youtube.com/user/KevinPadrick


Court Filing Against Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/98076240/David-Aman-Tonkon-Torp-for-Obsidian-Finance-Group-Trustee-Kevin-Padrick

Posted Here Proudly
by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

The New Jersey Courts served Shellee Hale up the Same Justice as the Oregon Courts Served up Blogger Crystal Cox. So does the Porn Industry Control Media, Control Judges and Suppress Information with Power, Secrets and Clout? I bet So. And Note they are using the iViewit Technology that I fight for the inventors rights over.

"Shellee Hale, claimed security flaws in a company in the online porn industry, is being sued by a Freehold firm for slander. The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the case today."


"Depending how far the ruling goes, the case involving Washington State resident Shellee Hale could more clearly define whether bloggers receive the same type of protections as "traditional’’ journalists in New Jersey.

Hale, a former Microsoft employee and a private investigator, argues she was preparing an article for her website, Pornafia, on the infiltration of pornography on the Internet when she posted her comments about Too Much Media Inc. in 2008.

In comments she posted to a message board about a security breach by TMM, Hale claimed its owners had threatened her. TMM, which helps online adult entertainment companies track sales, sued for defamation and Hale sought protection of New Jersey so-called shield law from revealing her sources. TMM argued Hale is not a journalist and fabricated the purpose of her website to seek the protection."

Source of Quote and Full Article
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/06/nj_supreme_court_to_rule_wheth.html

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/05/blogger_in_online_porn_company.html

Shellee Hale Lost this Case as many of us know by now, but WHY?

See Bloggers Can Be Journalists,
Just Not Crystal L. Cox or Shellee Hale, Why?

Well, you see, it is because we do a better job at telling the Real News than the archaic Big Media like Forbes, New York Times, the Oregonian, Lee Enterprises and More. And we are truly independent.

Bloggers are the Real News, and Investigative Bloggers Crystal Cox and Shellee Hale proved that.

Oh and remember the Big Talking of Washington State Attorney, Bruce E. H. Johnson about how if the case was in Washington, the Shield Law would apply.  Thing is Shellee Hale was a Washington State Resident, and the company was in New Jersey, so that is where they served up her justice.
http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2011/12/unlike_oregon_bloggers_are_jou.php

Yet Judges in both cases say that we are not journalists because we are not associated with Big Media. And Judge Marco Hernandez, after accusing blogger Crystal Cox of a crime she did not commit in an Motion to Deny a New Trial in a "Civil Case", well Judge Marco Hernandez claimed that bloggers can be journalists, just not this blogger? Really?  

What about Shellee Hale? I guess it is just any blogger who threatens their Good Ol' Boys and Gals Network of using "Media" to supress information, control the masses, turn victims into criminals, and use the "News" to sell products and information in a way that keeps bringing in Big Money, for BIG Media and the Political, Corporate driving force behind their agenda.

I had many email me on the Shellee Hale story last summer, as the same thing was happening to me. Whereby a Judge said we are not protected as journalists because we are not connected to main stream media.

Thing is, I did not know how related my exposing corruption was to the Porn Industry. I knew that the Porn Kings use the iViewit Technology. However this case, seemingly about Free Speech, really to me is about the FACT that bloggers, "New Media", certainly are "News Media" and they do a better, deeper, more independent job of investigating the story.

Bloggers are passionate about their story and, independent bloggers are not paid for a particular story most of the time. These investigative bloggers simply go after a story because they are passionate about it for some reason or the other. Oftentimes they know someone affected by a certain company, corporations, or judicial authority and they start a blog and dig deep. These anti-corruption, real news bloggers, are who I stand for, as they get constant attacks from all sides for simply bringing you the real story with documents, facts, and proof.

Big Media needs to silence bloggers like me, and Shellee Hale, in order to keep their control over the masses with their version of the "Real News", which is, most often just partial quotes, pieces of videos and no documents to back up the story. They simply call both sides and get a double does of hearsay and they call that the news. And they present the news with an "Agenda". You have always known this, however NOW bloggers threaten this strong foothold of control and power. And Big Media wants to Shut us UP.

I had a vision last night, as yes, laugh or not, but this is intensely spiritual for me. Anyway, I saw the Shellee Hale case brightly lit in my minds eye, and felt strong about looking again as to whom she was exposing and how her Judicial Decision seemed to suppress the real information she was bringing to light.

So today I looked at the story again from the perspective I now have, and there it was. She was exposing the Porn Industry. And where was this case? New Jersey, which is where David Carr of the New York Times is the Reigning Media Scum King.  Just how connected David Carr is to money in the porn industry, I am not sure and plan to investigate this along with my army of investigative bloggers. If you want to join us in exposing corruption, start a blog, with FACTS, proven facts, and email a link to me SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

It makes sense now, as the Porn Industry is what really got the internet technology to where it is today. And iViewit Alone got video technology to where it is today, though the inventors never got any rights.

The New York Courts, as Well as Florida are the Judges, and main "Authority" behind protecting Proskauer Rose, MPEG LA, Warner Bros., Liberty Media, Sony, Time Warner Inc., Foley and Lardner, Michael Grebe, AOL, Arthur Anderson, and others in the Courts.

And all these connection have controlled the USPTO for over a decade and Eliot Bernstein and the iViewit Technology Company, Inventors have yet to see any money or rights for what is now, a 13 Trillion Dollar Video Technology, that the Porn Industry has been fully dependent on for over a decade.

Liberty Media, Corbin Fisher, Warner Bros., ATT, and many others have used the iViewit Technology for over a Decade. Yet the iViewit Technology inventors never got patent rights to this stolen technology. There is over 1000 documents online proving this case and still no justice for the iViewit Inventors.

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://www.iviewit.tv/

Now that this is all coming together for me, I am convinced that Marc Randazza was planning on sabotaging my case to protect Big Wigs in the Porn Industry. He was already working on this, as my alleged attorney, and then he was called by my Real Attorney, and so not knowing my Real Attorney contacted me, Marc Randazza emailed that he would represent me, though he was already working on all this behind my back. Marc Randazza, I am convinced, wanted to make this go away, whatever it took to NOT go to appeal to protect the rights of the Porn Industry whom he is their Star Attorney.

Thank God, the Great Spirit that I have the Attorney I do have, and that this amazingly important issue to citizen journalists, whistle blowers, whistle bloggers, and anti-corruption bloggers are getting seen in a different light and getting this debate into an arena to decide once and for all, are ANY bloggers Journalists?

Are bloggers journalists unless they get serious and expose corruption where the corrupt could lose millions? Are bloggers journalists except for Crystal Cox and Shellee Hale because they affect the bottom line of big Porn Companies and Major Energy Companies such as Obsidian Finance Group, as well as the corruption in the Judicial System itself?

Bottom line, Traditional Journalists like David Carr of the New York Times, have a lot to lose if Bloggers are legally considered Journalists and have the same rights as Journalists. Bottom Line, the Porn Industry seems to control whatever the hell they want to control for a multitude of reasons. They have big money, big power and lots' of secrets on each other it seems.

Also don't forget folks, most of my posts were deemed protected speech. It was the alluding to facts that concerned them, seeings how I am not "big media" and all.

http://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/blogs-context-suggests-posts-are-protected-opinion

All except for one post where it looked like this Yammering Blogger was attempting to be factual and bring to you hard hitting FACTS. 

Start a Blog
Expose Corruption
You are the Real News.
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
http://investigativeblogger.blogspot.com/

And though I keep getting offers to let me out of a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement if I Stand Down, I refuse, for I stand for all citizen journalists, whistle blowers, whistle bloggers, and anti-corruption bloggers, whom I consider the Real News, Of the People, by the People, for the People.

Una Stamus

Keep EXPOSING THEM

Stand TALL 

you are a Lighthouse in a Shit Storm Bloggers.




More on the Shellee Hale Case
http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/too-much-media-llc-v-hale

http://www.citmedialaw.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-03-04-Hale's%20Motion%20for%20Application%20of%20Newsperson's%20Privilege.pdf
She also does internet investigations and reputation management.

When Are Bloggers Journalists? "Simply put, new media should not be confused with news media," . Blogger Crystal Cox Disagrees, and says that New Media is the Real NEWS.

"Appeals Court Upholds Ruling That Blog Commenter Was Not A Journalist

from the too-bad dept

While lots of attention was paid to the claims that the confiscation of Gizmodo reporter Jason Chen's computer's would "settle" whether bloggers are considered journalists, the details in that case suggest otherwise. However, a much more important case on that particular question was decided late last week. It's the case of Shellee Hale, which we've covered in the past. Basically, Hale posted some information claiming a security breach at another company.

She revealed this information as a comment on another site -- and when she was sued, the company demanded she reveal where she got that information from.

She claimed that her sources were protected, as she was a journalist.

The court ruled against her, saying that because she had "no connection to any legitimate news publication," her own investigations weren't journalism.

That's troubling for a variety of reasons, especially given the wide latitude in determining what constitutes a "legitimate news publication." Hale appealed, and unfortunately, the ruling last week from the appeals court upheld the lower court's ruling:


"Simply put, new media should not be confused with news media," wrote Superior Court Appellate Judge Anthony J. Parrillo.

The court also claimed that her activities were not journalism because they "exhibited none of the recognized qualities or characteristics traditionally associated with the news process, nor has she demonstrated an established connection or affiliation with any news entity."

"However, the real battle seems to be over the attempt to determine how the woman, Shellee Hale, found out about the breach in the first place. She's refusing to give that up, claiming that she has a right to protect her sources, just like any journalist.

And while Hale writes multiple different blogs, and has written for many mainstream publications (including the Wall Street Journal and Business Week), Too Much Media claims that she doesn't deserve protections afforded to journalists because she wasn't working for any real publication and is just a blogger. The article quotes someone who says that if the court sides with Hale: "then everyone is a journalist and the privilege becomes meaningless."

I don't see how that's actually true. In fact, I'd argue the other way. It's not that it becomes meaningless, but that it becomes very, very meaningful -- especially in an era where we're looking for new ways to prop up investigative journalism. If everyone's a journalist, and everyone has a reasonable expectation that their sources are shielded, then we're much more likely to continue to root out corruption.

If this protection is somehow reserved for some "special" credentialed people, then it becomes that much harder to expose corruption.

Unfortunately, it appears that the judge in the case is almost entirely computer and internet illiterate, needing to ask for explanations for a variety of things during the court proceedings. He seemed entirely confused by the very concept of people blogging for personal interest:

"Why would a guy put all this stuff on a blog? Does he have nothing better to do?" Locasio asked. "Does he get paid?"

The judge, who apparently is about to retire in a couple months, also didn't understand the difference between blogs, message boards and forums, and was apparently unfamiliar with instant messaging.

It's difficult to see why someone entirely unfamiliar with the technology should be able to judge a case like this, where understanding what's happening online is crucial to understanding what the case is really about."

Source of Post
http://www.techdirt.com/blog/?tag=shellee+hale