Love this Search "Kenneth P. White Extortion" Searched out of Salinas. Gee I seem to consume every single spot on the first page. Free Speech EXPOSING Corruption.

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Search Referral:				www.google.com — Kenneth P. White Extortion #1
Host Name:				adsl-99-107-99-56.dsl.mtry01.sbcglobal.net									Browser:				IE 9.0
IP Address:				99.107.99.56 — [Label IP Address]									Operating System:				Win7
Location:				Salinas, California, United States									Resolution:				1311x737
Returning Visits:				0									Javascript:				Enabled
Visit Length:				4 mins 41 secs									ISP:				At&t Internet Services

Navigation Path

Date	Time	WebPage Multiline URLs
		www.google.com — Kenneth P. White Extortion #1
27 Jul	13:05:13	www.marcrandazza.com/2012/04/c-s-p-schofield-of-pope-hate-kenneth-p.html
		www.google.com — Kenneth P. White Extortion #2
27 Jul	13:07:19	www.marcrandazza.com/2012/04/public-participation-project-kenneth-p.html
		www.google.com — Kenneth P. White Extortion #7
27 Jul	13:08:21	www.marcrandazza.com/2012/04/did-marc-randazza-extort-rush-limbaugh.html
27 Jul	13:09:54	articles.cnn.com/2012-03-12/opinion/opinion_randazza-limbaugh-speech_1_rush-limbaugh-politeness-test-public-interest?_s=PM:OPINION

Marc Randazza will Do ANYTHING to Silence Free Speech. Marc Randazza is So Full of Shit as he Blathers on and on how he is Pro the First Amendment. See Marc Randazza can DISH IT OUT, but Marc Randazza CANNOT take it.

http://unwashedadvocate.com/2012/03/16/marc-randazza-driving-the-white-caddy/
First Amendment Advocate.. Marc Randazza acts like the First Amendment is so important to him, Marc Randazza does this to get client. See really Marc Randazza, will sue, perjure himself, remove blogs, lie, threaten, paint in false light, steal intellectual property, and intimidate those who dare tell talk about Marc Randazza in their First Amendment Rights sort of Way.

Marc Randazza is a HATER of Free SPEECH unless you pay him to defend your Free Speech Rights, hey is that Extortion. I Say Yes. Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite INDEED.

MarcRandazza.com, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. MarcRandazza.com and the War with Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and Internet Savvy Blogger Crystal Cox Rages On. MarcRandazza.com is the domain name that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group was just not SAVVY enough to Buy. So Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is fighting Free Speech Rights of all, so that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group can STEAL MarcRandazza.com. Expose Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Email your Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group tip to Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, an unEthical Attorney.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza had a phone interview with me, Blogger Crystal Cox, to determine if Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza wanted or could take the Obsidian Finance Vs. Crystal Cox case on appeal.

After Crystal Cox spoke with Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, I bought MarcRandazza.com, because it was available and I wanted to use the domain name to further the cause of the case and Free Speech rights.

Then, soon after this call, in a highly unethical manner, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group contacted the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, without letting Crystal Cox know that he was doing so, or even representing her.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group gave away privileged information, negotiated my case and Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group gave private information.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not contact me to let me know he represented me. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group told members of the First Amendment bar that he, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did represent Crystal Cox.

Meanwhile, I Crystal Cox Blogger, had picked another attorney who had previously contacted me. This attorney contacted Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group about his yapping to the First Amendment Bar in representing me.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claimed, indeed that he did represent Blogger Crystal Cox, me. Which was in no way True. 

Just after this conversation Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza sent me, Crystal L. Cox an email saying that he Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group would represent me Crystal Cox on appeal.

I told Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group that I did not want Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group to represent me, as I had chose another attorney who had treated me with dignity and respect.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group pretended to be fine with this decision. And Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group told me that all was fine with it. We had spoke previously about my marketing abilities.

And so about a month after Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group acted as if he was fine that I chose another attorney, I emailed Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and asked Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group if he had use for internet marketing in his business. He said he did not need internet marketing for his firm and he demanded that I give him MarcRandazza.com, even though Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had never bought that domain name in all these years as an alleged Internet Lawyer and Domain Name Expert, Hmmm !!!!

When I refused to Give him the domain name, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group got very mad and threatened me. He said you really want to make an enemy of me, in that purely mafia style threatening manner. After this, to teach me a lesson Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group  conspired with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to set me up for Extortion.

And Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had no proof that any such thing happened. In fact, blogger Crystal Cox, me, had not written anything to EXPOSE Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group until Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group offered to join the Plaintiff and set up his own alleged client.

Blogger Crystal Cox NEVER offered to remove anything she had written online about Marc Randazza for MONEY. I even refused his offer to buy the Domain Name.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group continues to lie and claim that blogger Crystal Cox, me, wanted money to remove information. However Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is flat out lying. I had not written one word about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group until he conspired to set me up and harm me and I defended myself in the search engines.

 I felt extremely compelled to set the record RIGHT, get my side of the story in the search engines and to expose Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and how he treats his clients.

How can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group justify using his alleged clients information to set them up for things they did not do and how can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group use information he was given in confidence as a weapon to ruin the life of his client, or client to be?

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's hypocritical actions led me to buy more Domain Names to make fun of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and his lack of knowledge in Domain Name Law, Intellectual Property and Free Speech rights as proven by the fact that he never bought that domain name, and that he got my blogs and accounts shut down to suppress MY free speech. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group even filed for a protective order out of Las Vegas in order to suppress Free Speech.

It sure seems that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group will go to any lengths to SUPPRESS Free Speech. If that Free Speech is about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group defends others to have the same right to own domain names with other people's name in it. Seriously, it is blatantly obvious that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is a hypocrite.

How in the world can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claim to be an advocate of Free Speech when Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has done everything he can, short of taking my life, in order to suppress my Free Speech Rights.

To further my point that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group was ill equipped at domain name law, I purchased the domain name of his child and his wife. Of which I created a Blog on JenniferRandazza.com, to, again prove that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not have the skills he proclaimed to have in this Internet Legal World. The other domain name, was NEVER, ever published in any way by me. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group flat out lied to big media and claimed that I did publish this domain name. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group painted blogger Crystal Cox, me, in False Light deliberatly. Yet, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has no accountability.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group ruins lives. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group spreads lies about his clients and ex-clients and with seemingly no remorse.

After having made my point that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is an Idiot. I, Blogger Crystal Cox deleted the domain name that allegedly was dumbass Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's darkest hour of terror. And I gave away JenniferRandazza.com, the name of the wife of Free Speech / Domain Name Attorney Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's wife.  I gave the name away to further the cause of exposing injustice in the Porn Industry and to help expose stalking and activities of those connected to Randazza Legal Group's J. Malcolm Devoy.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is said to have stolen that domain name from a GoDaddy Account, with the help of a Godaddy Employee Allegedly.

I gave MarcRandazza.com to the same person for the same reasons. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group seemed to have threatened this person and even posted on chat sites the persons car and make of care and wishing them death. So in fear they returned the domain name to me. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group then filed an Arbritration complaint to steal the Domain name MarcRandazza.com that  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group  was to dumb to buy.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims to be an Advocate of Free Speech, however, Blogger Crystal Cox knows that to be an absolute falsehood.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group  shut down one of my Google accounts, simply because I made fun of and exposed Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had my wordpress blogs shut down because Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not like me exposing the actions, hypocrisy and butt hurt of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lied to Forbes regarding Crystal Cox.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has lied to the world about me. Nothing I can do but tell the Truth, the whole Truth and have Faith.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lied to a national radio program regarding the actions of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claimed in the Sandra Fluke case that Butthurt does not pay. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is butthurt and stealing intellectual property over it.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is butthurt and ruining lives over it.

Do your homework BEFORE you even speak to Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.  Blogger Crystal Cox claims that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has so many connections that the law and the constitution is irrelevant. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lies to big media and they eat it up. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group whines to anyone who will believe Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's flat out lies.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has inside connections everywhere and will get your blog shut down, will steal your domain names, and Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group will violate your constitutional rights, your Free Speech rights. And all under the guise of Free Speech Advocate.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a good man.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT an honest attorney.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a Free Speech Advocate.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a Truth Teller.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a domain name law expert.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT an advocate of the Constitutional Rights of All.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, a hypocrite and will do anything to silence Free Speech when that Free Speech is telling on Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

Do your home work regarding Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.  Find your own facts about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Read the cases of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and decide for yourself if the actions of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group against blogger Crystal Cox seem to be hypocritical.

Got a tip regarding Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy? Email your Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy tip to Crystal Cox at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com .

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox is dedicated to EXPOSING Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, and J. Malcolm Devoy.

If Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy find a way to make me disappear. I trust my readers will take up the reigns in Exposing Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and J. Malcolm Devoy.

Doesn't this Remind you of Marc Randazza? Remember his Hour of Terror he Spoke of NPR when Crystal Cox Bought MarcRandazza.com and then had the Gall to "Not Like Him" on that Very Dotcom ?

Marc Randazza and Kenneth P. White Whistleblower Tips

Marc Randazza

"From: RedLineHome RedLineHome <redlinehome@yahoo.com>

To: "Crystal L. Cox, in Love and Light" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: Randazza and Kenneth P. White

Hi, Crystal.

I appreciate what you are doing so  very much.

I have initiated my own criminal investigation into Kenneth P. White and the backlinking posting group associated with the Skeptic Society.  I have been a horrific victim.  I find my health has taken a significant turn for the worse here.

I would appreciate it if you build on the facts I have provided to you, which I believe to be correct, but not use my words.

Blessings to you and I hope you suceed.  If you actually read his blog you will see he has attacked so many, many people.

You might find counsel among those Legal Spammers he has ridiculed on his blog.

There are several California attorneys there.

Thank you again."

"From: RedLineHome RedLineHome <redlinehome@yahoo.com>

To: "Crystal L. Cox, in Love and Light" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: Randazza and Kenneth P. White

Is there a group being paid to blog against you?

You think its because of the Randazza thing.

Look at this from the alternative health care angle ... look at Meaghan Maloney.  Follow the money.

Who blogs against alternative health care?  What does Kenneth P. White of Brown, White & Newhouse, LLP have to do with that?

Follow the money."

"From: RedLineHome RedLineHome <redlinehome@yahoo.com>

To: "Crystal L. Cox, in Love and Light" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 4:56 AM
Subject: Re: Randazza and Kenneth P. White

Damnit, I went to Harvard AND I WANT TO PLAY!

Poor, Kenneth P. White at the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Blog - is so desperate to be a First Amendment Lawyer.  Problem is, he has destroyed his own, and his firm's credibility.

There he goes, with his middle aged limpers jog, huffing and puffing to the rescue of Marc Randazza beckoning in 7,000 plus words, follow me, follow me to his little Greek Chorus. 

Protect Marc Randazza, but hey, I totally respect the attorney's for Crystal Cox, remember that, remember that, REMEMBER ME, LET ME IN PLEASE GUYS!!!

Eugene Volokh and the Electronic Frontier Foundation - I LOVE YOU, TOO!

Kenneth P. White at the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Blog proclaims: I have an army of bloggers, I can help you, 

HERE I AM, Damnit, I went to Harvard and I want to play!!!

Look at what I have done, look at the incredible cases I have been a part of - Marc Stephens, well maybe not a case, maybe just a smear job, but hey, look at Meaghan Maloney.

Did ya see that ONE, Did ya, Did ya, Did ya???  Well, maybe there are a few issues there that I forgot to mention, but hey, READ MY ACCOUNT.

LET ME IN!!! I WANT TO PLAY, and oh, yeah, ATTACK CRYSTAL COX!!!

Lest you forget, Kenneth P. White at the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Blog  has the NOW MYSTERIOUS 

Popehat.com signal, and it even has a remote control and I can blast my little signal into the cybersky whenever I want.   It's mine, all mine, no one else at Brown White & Newhouse, LLP gets to fire it up except me!!!

Kenneth P. White at the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Blog  begs, LET ME IN, Marc Randazza is soooooooooooooo cool!  Eugene Volokh, is so great.  Is anyone listening?

Damnit, I went to Harvard AND I WANT TO PLAY!"

"From: RedLineHome RedLineHome <redlinehome@yahoo.com>

To: "Crystal L. Cox, in Love and Light" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: Randazza and Kenneth P. White

Crystal you have hooked yourself into something bigger than you can imagine.

Be careful now.  Save your credibility.

I can guide you here and you will find you have stepped into something HUGE."

"From: RedLineHome RedLineHome <redlinehome@yahoo.com>

To: "Crystal L. Cox, in Love and Light" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Randazza and Kenneth P. White

You should make a simple statement that Kenneth P. White of the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Pope.com Blog has painted you in a false light.

Kenneth P. White of the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Pope.com Blog has made a false implication regarding the domain registration of Marc Randazza's children. The domains were purchased to make the point that Marc Randazza does not have the level of internet expertise that he claims to have.  The domains have been transferred to Marc Randazza.

Kenneth P. White of the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Pope.com Blog  is using "rhetorical hyperbole" and "imaginative expression" that "cannot be read to imply the assertion of an objective fact." 

See Partington v. Bugliosi, 56 F.3d 1147, 1157 (9th Cir. 1995). False light concerns false implications made by Kenneth P. White of the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Pope.com Blog and the intentions and actions of Crystal Cox and made with malice. 

This is a "highly offensive statement to a reasonable person." Fellow v. Nat'l Enquirer, Inc., 32 Cal. 3d 234, 238, 13 Media L. Rep. 1305 (Cal. 1986) (quoting Restatement 2d of Torts § 652E).

Fax this to Brown White & Newhouse, LLP ... post it if you like.

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE   THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE

IT IS A SUGGESTION FOR PUBLIC RELATIONS"

"From: RedLineHome RedLineHome <redlinehome@yahoo.com>

To: "Crystal@CrystalCox.com" <Crystal@CrystalCox.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2012 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: Randazza and Kenneth P. White

Take everything that he is threatening to publish INCLUDING all your emails and register them at the U.S. Copyright office in one batch for $35.00

If these are registered within three months of first publication you get statutory damages of at least $750 per occurence plus attorney's fees.

You can copyright pleadings, your deposition, and your emails.

Read this:  http://freedomguide.blogspot.com/2011/03/open-letter-to-popehatcoms-ken.html

Kenneth P. White of Brown White & Newhouse, LLP is threatening a kid for copyright.

HE LOST.  his stuff was not registered.  The kid put it back up.

Kenneth P. White of Brown White & Newhouse, LLP is a huge bully.

There is sooooooooooo much more.

Also, you bought those domains of randazza's kids so he could not use them and to prove a point ... he does not know what he is doing.  He can have them in a year or so but you wanted to make a point.  MAKE THAT CLEAR.  Do not let Kenneth P. White of Brown White & Newhouse, LLP 

PLACE YOU IN A FALSE LIGHT IN CALIFORNIA

They have a very strong law on that."

"From: RedLineHome RedLineHome <redlinehome@yahoo.com>

To: "Crystal@CrystalCox.com" <Crystal@CrystalCox.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2012 4:55 PM
Subject: Randazza and Kenneth P. White

Hi, Crystal

I cannot get involved in this and I so hope you will respect that, please.

BUT, if you want to kill Popehat.com do this:

Tie his website to his lawfirm.  Go to the Meaghan Maloney posting and read:

1.  Went next door to partner got permissions

2.  December 19, 2011 comment from Newhouse Partner on "Great Job"

Then go to "why I post anonymously" at Popehat.

Mine [Clients] range from small-time criminals to substantial corporations, and at least some of them might be upset by my blogging. I don't expect that they would be upset in a he-made-an-unfair-anonymous-attack-on-someone sense. But they might be upset in a we-disagree-on-[social issue] sense, or a you-made-fun-of-people-who-support-[candidate] sense. Certainly I would no longer feel comfortable telling dumb-client stories, which I feel illuminate the condition of being a lawyer. 

You can open an account a http://www.pacer.gov/ too.  YOu can download all his pleadings or his firm's pleadings and OUT him.

Then you can look at the District Court's file for the county he is in for his and his firm's name for clients and pleadings.

Put up the first page of every case of every pleading that they have been involved in .. name the client and link to this page.

Link to all the pages where he admits who he is.

Whether you blog in YOUR NAME or a FICTITIOUS NAME ... the California rules or ethics regarding communications apply.

Tie that blog to his law firm ... and malpractice insurance.  Let all those clients come after him and his firm for malpractice.  They will be mad as hell.

do you have any idea how many people would come out of the woodwork if they were tied to him and then to his firm and then to his blog with him calling his onw clients SMALL TIME CRIMINALS.

Then his ability AND HIS FIRM'S ABILITY to work with the district attorney and US attorney has been compromised by HIS OWN ADMISSIONS in his blog.

Who wants to hire an attorney who has compromised his relationship with the US atty?

3. I blog anonymously because I have opposing counsel in hard-fought cases, as well as judges and their clerks. If I wrote this blog under my own name, it would not surprise me at all to see some civil opponent dropping a footnote saying something like "It is not at all surprising that Ken would take such a stance, given his inflammatory and inappropriate language about . . . ." etc. I'd also worry about my clients being treated more harshly by the District Attorney's Office and the U.S. Attorney's Office (especially that office, given it's current leadership) based on criticisms of them. In short, I'd worry that expressing myself freely in this forum could harm my clients — even though in a just world it shouldn't. (For what it is worth, I have not, and never would, call out a litigation opponent by name here, and use my anonymity as a weapon in a case I am litigating.)

Communicate via fax - with the senior partner of the firm.  Secretaries get those faxes and READ THEM AND GOSSIP like crazy.

Please do not tie me to this.  I have my own issues to deal with but I am rooting for you BIG TIME.

If you do something on this ... I have more on Randazza.  They ruined my life.  I have been in the hospital TWICE for chest pain since they attacked me.

Please keep it up!!!!

I am taking legal action so must be below the radar here."

"From: RedLineHome RedLineHome <redlinehome@yahoo.com>

To: "Crystal L. Cox, in Love and Light" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: Randazza and Kenneth P. White

CALL HIM OUT ON THE FACTS.

THAT'S A LONG POSTING - 7,563 words by my count.

Where is the one sentence:  Marc Ranazza did not do it.  He is innocent.

No where ... rather we have a convoluted, self-serving cry for ATTACK!

Ridicule his Popehat.com Signal call it his little Batman Signal

Ridicule is parotting Greek Chorus ...

Ridicule the fact that this guy has a degree from Harvard and he is nothing but a second rate unhappy lawyer.

Read and tie this to his law firm.

CRPC 1-400 defines "communication" and "solicitation." Communication is defined as "any message or offer . . . concerning the availability for professional employment . . . directed to any former, present, or prospective client . . . ." 

In his posting Ken Will Do Whatever Is Necessary - Game On Posting referencing Meaghan Maloney et ux we find Ken was unhappy being a "cog at BigLaw":

Here's the best thing about having a small firm with your name on the door, instead of a being a cog at BigLaw, like I was for the first five years of my private sector career: when someone deserving like Michael Hawkins writes and asks for help, you don't have to go through a pro bono committee. Instead, I got up, talked to my awesome managing partner in the next office, and within a few minutes agreed to help Michael Hawkins pro bono. Excelsior.

The problem is that elsewhere in his blog we find he has migrated to a firm where he considers his clients to be beneath him and his skills.  Unethically, he blogs about those unfortunates who pay his fee in return for his unethical and public contempt  ....

Mine [Clients] range from small-time criminals to substantial corporations, and at least some of them might be upset by my blogging. I don't expect that they would be upset in a he-made-an-unfair-anonymous-attack-on-someone sense. But they might be upset in a we-disagree-on-[social issue] sense, or a you-made-fun-of-people-who-support-[candidate] sense. Certainly I would no longer feel comfortable telling dumb-client stories, which I feel illuminate the condition of being a lawyer. Brown, White and Newhouse, LLP Popehat.com Blog, June 9, 2009  EXHIBIT "A"

We find he dislikes the U.S. Attorney's Office and the State's District Attorney's Office:

I'd also worry about my clients being treated more harshly by the District Attorney's Office and the U.S. Attorney's Office (especially that office, given it's current leadership) based on criticisms of them. In short, I'd worry that expressing myself freely in this forum could harm my clients — even though in a just world it shouldn't. Brown, White and Newhouse, LLP Popehat.com Blog, June 9, 2009  EXHIBIT "A"

It can be inferred from the dissatisfactions displayed in the BWN blog, that Kenneth P. White dreamed of a legal career that provided more significant recognition than he has apparently received from those parties he names as foils to the true recognition he deserves:

·         

A cog at "big law", and the "big law firm" that provided him training, employment, health insurance, salary and a 401K (now protected from judgment by bankrupty law)

·         The District Attorney's Office

·         The U.S. Attrorney's Office

·         Small-time criminals that currently provide employment, health insurance, salary and a 401K (now protected from judgment by bankrupty law)

·         To substantial corporations that currently provide employment, health insurance, salary and a 401K (now protected from judgment by bankrupty law)

The Brown, White and Newhouse Popehat Blog of Kenneth P. White we are treated to the fantasies of a middle aged man who dreams of a world where people genuflect to his power as a blogger and his ability to unite other bloggers to post against his latest target.

GET HER BOYS!!!

Oh, and in your frenzy forget what she said about Marc Randazza, because his is MY HERO, MY FRIEND, forget the facts and ATTACK!"

"From: RedLineHome RedLineHome <redlinehome@yahoo.com>

To: "Crystal L. Cox, in Love and Light" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Randazza and Kenneth P. White

You should make a simple statement that Kenneth P. White of the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Pope.com Blog has painted you in a false light.

Kenneth P. White of the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Pope.com Blog has made a false implication regarding the domain registration of Marc Randazza 's children. The domains were purchased to make the point that Marc Randazza does not have the level of internet expertise that he claims to have.  The domains have been transferred to Marc Randazza.

Kenneth P. White of the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Pope.com Blog  is using "rhetorical hyperbole" and "imaginative expression" that "cannot be read to imply the assertion of an objective fact." 

See Partington v. Bugliosi, 56 F.3d 1147, 1157 (9th Cir. 1995). False light concerns false implications made by Kenneth P. White of the Brown White & Newhouse, LLP Pope.com Blog and the intentions and actions of Crystal Cox and made with malice. 

This is a "highly offensive statement to a reasonable person." Fellow v. Nat'l Enquirer, Inc., 32 Cal. 3d 234, 238, 13 Media L. Rep. 1305 (Cal. 1986) (quoting Restatement 2d of Torts § 652E).

Fax this to Brown White & Newhouse, LLP ... post it if you like.

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE   THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE

IT IS A SUGGESTION FOR PUBLIC RELATIONS"

Marc Randazza

Tips to Crystal Cox Blogger From "Randazza Insider". Scott Donahey, and Peter Michelson and Houston Lowry and Tom Halket.

"From: Randazza Insider <randazza.insider@googlemail.com>

To: "Crystal L. Cox, in Love and Light" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: Questions About TODD KINCANNON

I Don't think Marc is Upset About That - I did hear from Others, though, that he is Upset about Something.  I think You are Finally getting to Him - especially when you Reach the Domainers, for whom Randazza is no Advocate.

Randazza is a Member of INTA, which stands for the International Trademark Association, and Goes to their Meetings all the time. Hes made a lot of High Level connections through INTA, including Scott Donahey, and Peter Michelson and Houston Lowry and Tom Halket. They are all FRIENDS(and colleagues), and I've seen the links! together.  In fact, ALL of INTA are basically High Level attorneys working together to STICK IT to domainers and the little guy so they can all get Wealthy - them and ICANN.

All of these INTA guys are Basically all his Cronies. Do you know about Donahey's Argument that Bad Faith is "retroactive" when registering domain names? That kind of slippery argument sounds JUST LIKE RANDAZZA's bullshit.  Here is the case where Donahey gets all Randazza http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0786.html How else wold such a crooked argument get anywhere? How can you have "bad faith" RETROACTIVELY?

RANDAZZA THINKS it is OK to accuse someone of Rape and Murder in a Domain Name, and then Befriend and scheme with the INTA anti-Domainers? And the retroactive bad faith test is the WORST.

Something stinks; and Randazza and Donahey and the rest of them are always at the INTA meetings at the same time. And Donahey's decision to recognize RETROACTIVE bad faith is in favor of who? OCTOGEN? BIG PHARMA!

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Crystal L. Cox, in Love and Light <savvybroker@yahoo.com> wrote:

did you see MikeSouth.com today, what do you think of the AVN thing

sources say Marc is pretty upset about it.. "

 

Tips to Crystal Cox Blogger From "Randazza Insider".

"Crystal, 

Keep up your hard work! You ARE on to the hunt! Just like any tiger though, you have him by the tail. The light will not go out if good people keep the power to the light. Firstly you are RIGHT about United States vs. Randazza. It is BLANK! Do NOT be fooled by frenemies. friENEMIES are "friends who will FRY you and are ENEMIES". If you ask a lawyer/advocate/judge as to WHY that case is BLANK, remember who they have LOYALTY to. They have it to themselves and to the SYSTEM that feeds them. SOME want money. SOME want to be on the Supreme Court. Will they who want these things risk exposing the truth that starts in Hemmer and that ends in Randazza vs. United States; in that case's files. (PAPER files, not electronic that can be changed)

SOME lawyer MAY tell you the TRUTH. MOST will not. The friENEMY will tell you something to make you confused and to make you stop looking and to stop digging. If you ask an advocate and they tell you something that sounds like it is meant to put you off of the trail, then they must be SUSPECT. There is SO MUCH MONEY at stake. SO MUCH POWER! I have looked at that case too. They told me that it was nothing. Stop looking. STOP LOOKING, NOTHING TO SEE HERE!

But IF you find the lawyer and advocate who says "YES, Randazza vs. United States - it IS NOT KOSHER" and they encourage you to go to WASHINGTON. To the ARCHIVES. They can't make all the papers disappear. NOT ALL! If you find this ONE (maybe two) lawyer who is honest, and she or he gives you encouragement, then you know that you found someone who can not be BOUGHT. AND it will be a woman lawyer probably. Men have the strings and give them up only if FORCED. 

The explosion, it IS not normal at ALL. DID YOU NOTICE THIS? (in the article about it)

"As Sargent walked down the stair case, while calling the oil company on his cellphone, the house exploded."

Coincidence?  How does THAT kind of timing happen? Was he REALLY on the phone with the OIL company? Why? For a GAS leak? HE called the OIL company for a GAS problem, and then ALL OF A SUDDEN, when he is on the phone with them, the detonation happens? WHY? 

And THIS "Graves said this morning that he did not have access yet to work crew records for that area so he could not confirm if work had been done in recent days."

HOW CONVENIENT! HAS IT EVER BEEN CONFIRMED? NO! WHY? 

AND do you wonder why someone is NOW in the public eye, but really only AFTER Mister "Nuclear powerplant scientist" is gone? "He's cool" indeed! WHY would the bank robber say "he's cool". Criminality is not learned. Criminality is in the blood. Where is RANDAZZA from? Why are there only so few "RANDAZZA" in United States and so many RANDAZZO? You can not hide the truth by changing ONE letter! Not from the truth! EASTER EXPOSE! "